Octa1neOcta1ne
REQUEST CONSULTATION
ServicesPlatformWhy Octa1neCareersContact
🛡️
Compliance
Frameworks & certifications
📝
BlogSOON
Latest security insights
📁
Case StudiesSOON
Client success stories
REQUEST CONSULTATION

Web Application
Security

Every web application and API you expose to the internet is being probed by automated scanners every few hours. A vulnerability your developers introduced in last week's release could be discovered by an attacker before anyone on your team knows it exists.

Octa1ne runs continuous automated scanning with OWASP ZAP and regular manual testing with Burp Suite Pro — finding vulnerabilities before attackers do, integrating security into your development pipeline and giving your team the evidence to prove your applications are secure.

43%
Of breaches start with web app attack
6 hrs
Avg time to first automated probe
OWASP Top 10
Full coverage every engagement
Burp + ZAP
Industry standard tooling
WHY THIS MATTERS

Your web applications are your largest externally exposed attack surface.

Web application attacks account for 43% of all data breaches globally — the single largest attack vector. Every application you expose to the internet is being continuously probed by automated scanners operated by criminal groups, nation-state actors and opportunistic hackers. New vulnerabilities are introduced every time developers deploy code. New CVEs affecting your third-party libraries are published every day.

The most dangerous vulnerabilities — broken access control, SQL injection, authentication flaws and business logic errors — cannot be found by automated scanners alone. They require a skilled security engineer who thinks like an attacker, tests the specific logic of your application and explores the interactions between features that automated tools follow in a straight line.

Octa1ne provides both layers: continuous automated scanning that catches new vulnerabilities as they are introduced, and regular manual penetration testing by certified engineers who find what automated tools cannot.

Book a web app assessment →
YOUR EXPOSED ATTACK SURFACE
Public-facing web applications
CRITICAL
Customer portals and dashboardsE-commerce and payment flowsSelf-service account managementPartner and vendor portals
APIs and backend services
CRITICAL
REST and GraphQL API endpointsMobile application backendsThird-party integration webhooksDeprecated API versions still live
Authentication surfaces
HIGH
Login and registration flowsPassword reset mechanismsOAuth and SSO integrationsSession management and tokens
File upload and processing
HIGH
Document upload featuresImage processing endpointsData import functionalityUser-generated content handling
Third-party components
MEDIUM
NPM and PyPI dependenciesCMS plugins and themesJavaScript librariesOpen-source frameworks
OWASP TOP 10 — FULL COVERAGE

The ten vulnerability categories
causing most application breaches globally

Octa1ne tests for all ten OWASP Top 10 categories on every engagement — both through automated scanning and manual expert testing where automation alone is insufficient.

A01
Broken Access Control
94% of apps tested

Users accessing data or functions they should not be able to reach. IDOR vulnerabilities allowing sequential ID enumeration. Missing authorisation on API endpoints. Privilege escalation by modifying role parameters. The most prevalent vulnerability category globally.

Auto: PartialManual: Essential
A02
Cryptographic Failures
Previously called Sensitive Data Exposure

Sensitive data transmitted without TLS. Weak or deprecated encryption algorithms. Hardcoded cryptographic keys. Insecure storage of passwords, tokens or PII. Missing encryption on sensitive database fields. Insufficient entropy in random number generation.

Auto: GoodManual: Required
A03
Injection
SQL, NoSQL, LDAP, OS Command

SQL injection allowing full database read and write. Command injection executing OS commands on the server. LDAP injection bypassing authentication. Template injection in server-side rendering. Cross-site scripting injecting JavaScript into page content viewed by other users.

Auto: StrongManual: Confirmed
A04
Insecure Design
Cannot be automated

Business logic flaws that make sense to a developer but create security vulnerabilities in practice. Workflows that can be abused beyond their intended use. Missing threat modelling resulting in inherently insecure application architecture. This category requires human expertise — no automated scanner can identify design-level security flaws.

Auto: NoneManual: Critical
A05
Security Misconfiguration
90% of apps have misconfiguration

Default credentials on admin interfaces. Verbose error messages exposing stack traces. Directory listing enabled on web servers. Debug functionality accessible in production. Missing security headers. Overly permissive CORS policies. Cloud storage buckets with public access enabled.

Auto: StrongManual: Enhanced
A06
Vulnerable and Outdated Components
Third-party library CVEs

NPM packages, Python libraries and JavaScript frameworks with known exploitable CVEs embedded in your application. Log4Shell, Spring4Shell and similar supply chain vulnerabilities affect components you may not know your application uses. Software composition analysis identifies every dependency.

Auto: StrongManual: Context
A07
Authentication and Session Failures
Password spray, session hijack

Missing account lockout enabling brute force attacks. Weak session tokens predictable from observable patterns. Session fixation vulnerabilities. Missing re-authentication before sensitive operations. Insecure remember-me token implementation. Password reset flows exploitable without account control.

Auto: PartialManual: Essential
A08
Software and Data Integrity Failures
Supply chain, CI/CD attacks

Unsigned or unverified software updates automatically installed. Insecure deserialization of untrusted data. CI/CD pipeline without integrity verification. Dependency confusion attacks through package manager misconfiguration. Auto-update mechanisms without signature validation.

Auto: PartialManual: Required
A09
Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
Detected in 84% of pen tests

Missing logging of authentication events, access control failures and input validation errors. Log output exploitable for log injection. Insufficient detail in logs to support incident investigation. No alerting on brute force attempts or suspicious activity patterns. SIEM integration gaps.

Auto: PartialManual: Essential
A10
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Critical in cloud environments

Application fetches remote URLs based on user-supplied input — allowing attackers to make the server send requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints and other infrastructure inaccessible from the internet. Particularly severe in cloud environments where metadata services expose credentials.

Auto: GoodManual: Depth
HOW WE TEST

Three testing layers.
Each finding what the others cannot.

No single testing approach covers the full vulnerability landscape. Octa1ne combines three complementary layers — each designed to find the vulnerabilities the other layers miss.

🔄
LAYER 01ONGOING — EVERY DEPLOYMENT
Continuous Automated Scanning
OWASP ZAP

OWASP ZAP runs continuously against your applications — either integrated into your CI/CD pipeline to scan before every deployment, or running on a scheduled cycle against production. Catches new vulnerabilities as they are introduced by code changes, configuration drift or newly published CVEs affecting your components.

FINDS
SQL and NoSQL injection
Cross-site scripting (XSS)
Security misconfigurations
Outdated component CVEs
Missing security headers
TLS and certificate issues
DOES NOT FIND ALONE
Business logic flaws
Broken access control nuances
Chained vulnerability exploitation
Authentication bypass via logic
Custom parameter manipulation
🔍
LAYER 02QUARTERLY OR PER RELEASE
Manual Penetration Testing
Burp Suite Pro

Certified security engineers conduct structured manual testing using Burp Suite Pro — testing the specific logic of your application, exploring interactions between features and attempting exploitation chains that no automated tool will find. This is where IDOR, broken access control and insecure design vulnerabilities are discovered.

FINDS
Business logic vulnerabilities
Broken access control (IDOR)
Authentication bypass via logic
Chained attack exploitation
Insecure design flaws
Context-specific security gaps
DOES NOT FIND ALONE
Scale — focused not comprehensive
Newly introduced post-test vulns
Configuration drift between tests
🧬
LAYER 03EVERY CODE COMMIT
Source Code and Dependency Review
Semgrep + Snyk

Static analysis runs on every code commit — identifying security vulnerabilities in the source code before they reach production. Software composition analysis checks every third-party dependency against known CVE databases. Secrets scanning catches API keys, passwords and tokens accidentally committed to code repositories.

FINDS
Hardcoded secrets and API keys
Vulnerable dependency versions
Insecure cryptography usage
SQL string concatenation patterns
Dangerous function usage
Secrets committed to repositories
DOES NOT FIND ALONE
Runtime behaviour
Business logic in context
Third-party service vulnerabilities
🔗

The combination is what matters. Continuous scanning catches new vulnerabilities immediately. Manual testing finds what scanners cannot. Source review catches issues before they deploy. Together they provide coverage no single approach delivers.

TOOLS WE USE

Industry-standard tools.
Used by security teams at the largest organisations globally.

Industry standard
Burp Suite Professional
MANUAL DAST

The definitive web application security testing platform. Provides an integrated environment for testing, intercepting and manipulating all web traffic between browser and application. Used by security engineers at every top-tier consultancy and enterprise security team globally. The tool that finds what everything else misses.

Open source OWASP
OWASP ZAP
AUTOMATED DAST

The OWASP-maintained open-source dynamic application security testing tool. Best-in-class for continuous automated scanning integrated into CI/CD pipelines. Active and passive scan modes. Scriptable for custom tests. Maintained by the same organisation that created the Top 10 vulnerability framework.

Fast and accurate
Semgrep
SAST — STATIC ANALYSIS

Lightweight static analysis tool that runs in seconds rather than hours — making it practical for integration into every code commit. Extensive rule libraries covering common vulnerability patterns in every major programming language. Custom rules written for your specific codebase and risk profile.

SCA leader
Snyk
SOFTWARE COMPOSITION ANALYSIS

Continuous monitoring of open-source dependencies for known CVEs — integrated into GitHub, GitLab and CI/CD pipelines. Identifies vulnerable libraries at the PR level before they merge. Auto-fix pull requests for many common dependency upgrades. The most widely adopted SCA tool globally.

API specialist
Postman + Burp
API SECURITY TESTING

Postman combined with Burp Suite Pro for comprehensive API security testing — importing OpenAPI/Swagger specifications to enumerate all endpoints, test authentication mechanisms, verify authorisation on every endpoint and identify excessive data exposure in API responses.

Attack surface mapping
Nmap + Shodan
RECONNAISSANCE

Attack surface discovery before testing begins — identifying all externally accessible services, open ports, TLS configurations and infrastructure visible to an attacker. Combined with Shodan for passive reconnaissance of your organisation's internet-facing footprint to replicate attacker reconnaissance without active scanning.

DEVSECOPS INTEGRATION

Security in every sprint.
Not every quarter.

The cost of fixing a security vulnerability increases dramatically the later it is discovered. A vulnerability found during code review costs minutes to fix. The same vulnerability discovered in a quarterly penetration test costs days. Discovered post-breach — millions.

Octa1ne integrates security testing directly into your development workflow — automated SAST on every commit, SCA on every build, DAST on every staging deployment. Security findings surface in Jira tickets, GitHub PR comments or Slack alerts in the same sprint vulnerabilities are introduced.

GitHub / GitLab / Bitbucket
PR-level security scanning with inline comments
Jira / Linear
Automatic security ticket creation for findings
Jenkins / CircleCI / GitHub Actions
Pipeline security gates blocking insecure deployments
Slack / Teams
Real-time security alerts in your developer channels
Confluence / Notion
Security documentation embedded in your developer wiki
COST OF FIXING A VULNERABILITY BY PHASE
Code Review / Commit
1x
Caught by SAST in the same PR — developer fixes in minutes
Testing / Staging
10x
Caught by DAST before production — one sprint to remediate
Quarterly Pentest
100x
Discovered post-deployment — full remediation cycle required
Post-Breach Discovery
1000x
Found by an attacker or in an incident — full IR engagement
Fix vulnerabilities where they are cheapest — in the development pipeline, not the incident report.
WHAT YOU RECEIVE

Clear reports. Actionable fixes.
Evidence your applications are secure.

IMMEDIATELY ON DISCOVERY

Critical Finding Alerts

When a critical or high-severity vulnerability is identified during testing, your team is notified immediately — before the full report is written. Severity, affected component, business impact and recommended immediate action. No waiting days to learn about a SQL injection in your customer portal.

📋
PER ENGAGEMENT

Technical Findings Report

Full technical report for your development team: every vulnerability documented with severity rating, CVSS score, affected URL or code location, step-by-step reproduction instructions, proof-of-concept screenshots and precise remediation guidance specific to your technology stack.

📊
PER ENGAGEMENT

Executive Summary

Leadership-focused summary requiring no technical knowledge: vulnerabilities in plain English, business risk of each finding, overall application security posture rating, compliance implications and prioritised remediation recommendations. Suitable for board reporting and insurance renewal submissions.

POST-REMEDIATION

Remediation Verification

After your development team addresses findings, Octa1ne retests every reported vulnerability to confirm it has been successfully resolved. Verification report confirms closure with before-and-after evidence — providing the timestamped audit trail required for compliance and client security questionnaires.

📈
CONTINUOUS

Vulnerability Trend Dashboard

For clients on continuous scanning, a live dashboard tracks vulnerability count over time — showing whether your application security posture is improving, stable or deteriorating. New findings from code changes, average time to remediate and coverage metrics across your application portfolio.

🏆
QUARTERLY

Application Security Posture Review

Strategic review with your dedicated engineer: application security trend analysis, development team training gaps identified from finding patterns, secure coding recommendations specific to your technology stack and roadmap for improving your overall application security maturity.

WHAT CHANGES

From application risk
to verified security

🔍VISIBILITY
BEFORE OCTA1NE

No structured view of vulnerabilities in your web applications and APIs. New code releases introduce vulnerabilities with no systematic discovery process until something goes wrong.

AFTER OCTA1NE

Continuous automated scanning catches new vulnerabilities within hours of deployment. Regular manual testing finds what automation misses. Full vulnerability register maintained.

SPEED TO FIND
BEFORE OCTA1NE

Vulnerabilities discovered by attackers, during annual pen tests or — worst — when a breach occurs. Average time from vulnerability introduction to discovery: months.

AFTER OCTA1NE

SAST catches vulnerabilities at code commit. DAST catches them at deployment. Manual testing catches business logic flaws quarterly. Attackers find nothing that your team has not already found first.

💰REMEDIATION COST
BEFORE OCTA1NE

Vulnerabilities fixed post-deployment at 100x the cost of fixing during development. Breaches resulting in incident response, legal costs and reputational damage at 1000x.

AFTER OCTA1NE

Vulnerabilities surfaced during development — fixed in the same sprint at minimal cost. Security debt eliminated systematically. Emergency remediation is rare rather than routine.

🔗API COVERAGE
BEFORE OCTA1NE

APIs tested less rigorously than web applications despite exposing equivalent or greater data. IDOR, broken access control and excessive data exposure in APIs discovered late or not at all.

AFTER OCTA1NE

All API endpoints tested for authentication, authorisation, rate limiting, data exposure and injection — same rigour as web application testing. API security posture documented and tracked.

📋COMPLIANCE
BEFORE OCTA1NE

PCI-DSS, ISO 27001 and GDPR require web application security testing evidence. Annual pen test reports satisfy auditors but do not demonstrate continuous security assurance.

AFTER OCTA1NE

Continuous scanning evidence plus manual pen test reports demonstrate both depth and breadth of testing. Compliance evidence ready on demand. No scramble before certification audits.

👨‍💻DEV TEAM SECURITY
BEFORE OCTA1NE

Developers introduce security vulnerabilities without immediate feedback. Security training is generic and disconnected from the specific vulnerabilities appearing in their actual code.

AFTER OCTA1NE

Security findings surfaced in developer workflow — PR comments, Jira tickets, Slack alerts. Patterns in findings identify specific training gaps. Developers build security awareness from real examples in their own code.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Questions we hear from
every organisation we speak to

FREE — NO OBLIGATION — NO COMMITMENT REQUIRED

Find your vulnerabilities
before attackers do.

Book a free application security assessment. We will run automated scanning against one of your applications and give you a sample findings report — showing exactly what an attacker would find — with no commitment required.

Burp Suite Pro manual testing
OWASP Top 10 full coverage
Continuous ZAP scanning
API security testing
DevSecOps integration
Compliance evidence